skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Search for: All records

Creators/Authors contains: "Anderson, Stephan W."

Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher. Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?

Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.

  1. The application of compressed sensing (CS)-enabled data reconstruction for accelerating magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) remains a challenging problem. This is due to the fact that the information lost in k-space from the acceleration mask makes it difficult to reconstruct an image similar to the quality of a fully sampled image. Multiple deep learning-based structures have been proposed for MRI reconstruction using CS, in both the k-space and image domains, and using unrolled optimization methods. However, the drawback of these structures is that they are not fully utilizing the information from both domains (k-space and image). Herein, we propose a deep learning-based attention hybrid variational network that performs learning in both the k-space and image domains. We evaluate our method on a well-known open-source MRI dataset (652 brain cases and 1172 knee cases) and a clinical MRI dataset of 243 patients diagnosed with strokes from our institution to demonstrate the performance of our network. Our model achieves an overall peak signal-to-noise ratio/structural similarity of 40.92 ± 0.29/0.9577 ± 0.0025 (fourfold) and 37.03 ± 0.25/0.9365 ± 0.0029 (eightfold) for the brain dataset, 31.09 ± 0.25/0.6901 ± 0.0094 (fourfold) and 29.49 ± 0.22/0.6197 ± 0.0106 (eightfold) for the knee dataset, and 36.32 ± 0.16/0.9199 ± 0.0029 (20-fold) and 33.70 ± 0.15/0.8882 ± 0.0035 (30-fold) for the stroke dataset. In addition to quantitative evaluation, we undertook a blinded comparison of image quality across networks performed by a subspecialty trained radiologist. Overall, we demonstrate that our network achieves a superior performance among others under multiple reconstruction tasks. 
    more » « less